Austin · Power Automate Consulting

Power Automate Consulting. Built for your Austin company.

We help Austin operations, finance, and compliance teams replace the spreadsheet reconciliation, the manual approval routing, and the after-hours data entry with Power Automate flows and desktop RPA bots. One team scopes the process, builds the flow, connects it to your ERP, EHR, or CRM, and hands over documentation your own IT team can actually run without us.

Microsoft Solutions Partner 100+ Power Platform builds shipped Cloud flows + Desktop RPA
?

Why Power Automate?

TL;DRPower Automate is the "if this, then that" tool inside Microsoft 365. You describe a trigger (an email arrives, a form is submitted, a row is added), one or two conditions, and the actions that should happen next (save the file, ask for approval in Teams, update the ERP, notify a person).

Cloud flows handle anything that talks to modern apps through a connector — SharePoint, Dynamics 365, Salesforce, Outlook, Teams. Desktop RPA (Power Automate for Desktop) handles anything that only lives inside a legacy app — the mainframe screen, the browser portal with no API, the accounting system nobody wants to touch. Sunflower Lab builds both, and stitches them together so a single flow can span a modern ERP and a legacy vendor portal.

A
AMOT Controls
Texas · Industrial valves · Approval process automation
Power Automate · Power Apps
M
Metrix Vibration
Texas · IFS Oracle to reporting pipeline
SSIS · Power Platform
N
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Service Provider
Texas · RCM & case-processing bots — 200+ hours saved daily
Power Automate · Desktop RPA
Credentials & certifications
Microsoft Solutions Partner Texas DIR-registered vendor Inc. 5000 Honoree 100+ Power Platform builds
Common Challenges

Where Austin teams typically get stuck with Power Automate

Almost every Austin company we work with already owns Power Automate — it comes with their Microsoft 365 license. The problem is not the tool. The problem is that a good flow needs a scoped process, working connectors, and someone to monitor it once it runs unattended in production.

01

The process was never documented

Nobody wrote down the exceptions — the "if the invoice comes from Canada, then…" — and the first flow breaks the first week.

02

Half the systems have no connector

Legacy ERPs, vendor portals, and clinical platforms often need Desktop RPA or a custom connector, not a stock cloud flow.

03

Flows are running unattended and nobody knows

A flow silently fails at 2 a.m. on a Saturday. Two months later, an invoice is missing and nobody can explain why.

04

Premium-connector cost surprises

The first invoice looks fine. Then per-flow, per-user, and AI Builder credits show up and finance wants the plug pulled.

Before You Automate

Four things that separate a Power Automate program that lasts from one that gets shelved in six months

The tool itself is not the hard part. The four factors below are what actually decide whether your Power Automate program pays back for years or quietly falls apart the first time someone leaves the company. Every engagement we run puts each one in place before we hand over.

👥
Factor 1

A governance body — someone owns the automation program

What it is. A named group — often just two or three people, one from IT and one from operations — that reviews every new flow request, kills flows nobody uses anymore, and decides what gets built next.

Why it matters. Without a named owner, flows sprawl. Requests pile up faster than they ship, priorities get set by whoever emails loudest, and the flow that broke six months ago is still sitting broken. A governance body is the one thing that turns "we use Power Automate" into "we run an automation program."

What to define upfront. Who signs off on new flows. How you rank priority when three teams want their process next. What your ROI threshold is — the number below which you politely say no. And who arbitrates when the queue is on fire and something has to give.

📊
Factor 2

A centralized dashboard — one place to see every flow's health

What it is. A single Power BI (or equivalent) dashboard that shows every flow in the tenant — its last run, its success rate, its failure alerts, its named owner, and its measured payback against the process it replaced.

Why it matters. A business owner should not have to log into the maker portal to know whether their automation is working. When a flow silently fails at 2 a.m. Saturday, someone needs to see it before Monday morning — not two months later when an invoice is missing.

What to show on it. Last run and status. Rolling failure rate. Time saved vs. the baseline process. Cost consumed (Per-Flow, Per-User, or AI Builder credits) vs. the value delivered. Every flow's named owner and last-updated date.

📝
Factor 3

Documented process — before, after, and what changed for people

What it is. A one-page write-up per flow that answers three questions: how the process worked before, how it works now, and what changed for the people involved — including who was trained on the new way and how the old work was retired.

Why it matters. This is what lets the automation survive turnover, audits, and the "why does this exist?" question a year later. It is also what lets a new team member fix the flow without hunting down the person who left in 2024.

What to capture. The as-is process on one page (steps, people, systems, exceptions). The to-be process on one page (trigger, conditions, actions, owner). The change-management notes — who was affected, what they had to stop doing, what training they got, and how you measured that the change stuck.

⚖️
Factor 4

A prioritization framework — a written rule for what comes next

What it is. A method for ranking automation requests when there are more requests than there is capacity. Something as simple as scoring each request on impact, urgency, and effort — and picking the top three each quarter — beats picking by whoever asked last.

Why it matters. When every department wants their process automated, someone will choose. It should be a rule, not a favor. It should also cover the reverse case — when three flows break the same Monday morning, which one gets fixed first.

What to write down. The scoring you use for new requests. The tie-breaker when scores match. Who arbitrates. The ROI threshold below which the answer is no. And the incident rule: what "high severity" means and who is on call for it.

Note on fit: if your workflow is truly one-of-a-kind or requires deep hardware integration, a custom build may still win. For 90% of Austin ops workflows we see, Power Automate replaces the manual copy-paste directly — provided the four factors above are in place from day one.

Highly needed use cases

The six flows that pay back fastest

Across 100+ Power Platform builds, these six patterns come up in almost every engagement — and they are the ones that pay back the fastest. Each links to the case study that proves it.

Finance

Invoice & PO approval routing

An invoice hits the shared mailbox → the flow reads the amount, routes it to the right approver in Teams, files the PDF, and posts the entry to your ERP.

SFL clients: up to 85% invoice-processing reduction
👤
HR & Sales

Customer & employee onboarding

A form triggers the flow → adaptive card in Teams, salesperson auto-assigned, credit check with the third-party service, data pushed to the ERP.

Metal manufacturer: 90% reduction — 60 hrs → 6 hrs per customer
💳
Revenue Cycle

RCM & verification-of-benefits bots

Desktop bots log into payer portals, verify eligibility, extract patient data, and update your billing system — 24/7, including weekends.

Neuromonitoring Service Provider: 200+ hours saved daily across departments
🔍
Operations

Inspection ticket & QAQC routing

A purchase receipt in D365 auto-creates an inspection ticket, attaches the CR number, notifies the inspector in Teams, and pings if unassigned after 24 hours.

Dominion Engineering: 90% efficiency, 60 hrs/month saved
📊
Manufacturing

OEE & shift-report automation

Plant-floor entries flow from Power Apps → Azure SQL → Power BI, replacing multi-plant Excel workbooks and CyberQuery reports.

MAI: 40–60% report-generation-time reduction expected
📄
Documents

Document extraction with AI Builder

Contracts, safety sheets, and SOPs get parsed by AI Builder, key fields pushed into SharePoint or Dataverse, and full text made searchable — with an optional ChatGPT layer for Q&A.

SFL manufacturing SOP search: enterprise-ChatGPT enabled
Scope of Services

What our Power Automate Consulting covers

Every engagement covers three tracks: mapping the process before we build, building the cloud and desktop flows, and setting up the monitoring and governance so the flows keep running after we hand over.

01
Discovery & Design

Map the actual process — not the wish list

  • Process walkthroughs with the people who do the work today
  • Documented "as-is" flow with real exceptions (returns, escalations, edge cases)
  • "To-be" flow design with clear triggers, conditions, actions, and owners
  • Written scope, licensing recommendation, and fixed price by end of week one
DeliverableA one-page flow map and a fixed-price scope you can take to finance.
02
Build & Integrate

Cloud flows + Desktop RPA together

  • Cloud flows across SharePoint, Dynamics 365, Outlook, Teams, Forms, SQL Server, Salesforce, SAP
  • Desktop RPA (Power Automate for Desktop) for legacy ERPs, payer portals, and browser-only apps
  • Custom and premium connectors for Infor M3, IFS Oracle, Sage 300, Cadwell, Revedy, Waystar
  • AI Builder document extraction, sentiment, and prediction models where they earn their credit cost
  • Teams adaptive cards for approvals so users never leave Teams
DeliverableA tested, production flow — cloud, desktop, or both — with error handling and retry logic in place.
03
Monitor & Govern

Keep flows running unattended

  • Environment strategy (dev / test / prod) with proper solution promotion
  • DLP policies aligned with your data classification
  • Named ownership and application lifecycle for every flow
  • Failure alerting and a live Power BI dashboard of flow health
  • Licensing review — Per Flow vs Per User vs Process, and AI Builder credits
  • Team training on Central time plus a written runbook
DeliverableGoverned Power Platform tenant, monitored flows, and a licensing plan finance can defend.
Engagement Timeline

Typical 2 to 6 week timeline per flow

Cloud-only flows usually ship in two to four weeks. Flows that require Desktop RPA against a legacy system take four to six. Larger portfolios (a dozen flows) are staged in waves so early wins fund the later work.

01
Week 1

Process discovery

A 30-minute call, then a 3-day walkthrough of the actual process — who does what, where the exceptions live, which systems touch it. Written scope by end of week one.

02
Weeks 2–3

Build & connect

Cloud flow built in your tenant with real connectors. Desktop RPA added for legacy portals or ERP screens that have no API. Adaptive cards for Teams approvals.

03
Weeks 4–5

Test & harden

Real invoices, real cases, real forms. Retry logic, error handling, and failure alerting added. Named runs go into a health dashboard your team can watch.

04
Weeks 5–6

Handover & monitor

Environment and DLP setup, ownership assigned, written runbook, live training for admins and end users. 30 days of post-launch support included.

Case Studies

Selected Power Automate engagements

Recent engagements across healthcare technology, metal-powder manufacturing, and nuclear-power engineering — plus a companion Power BI build for a multi-branch pediatric practice. Each began with a manual process nobody wanted to keep doing and ended with a set of monitored flows or dashboards that run unattended.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Service Provider case study
CASE STUDY — HOUSTON HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY

200+ hours saved daily across departments

An intraoperative neuromonitoring service provider was processing 250+ patient cases per day manually, at 45–60 minutes each, with reader-pay calculations, VOB checks, and CMS-1500 updates all done by hand. Scope of work: a Cadwell three-step processing pipeline (ZinniaX → Cadwell & Revedy → CMS-1500), a Reader Pay bot, VOB bots for UHC and Waystar, 24/7 scheduled bots that clear weekend backlogs, and a Power BI dashboard for real-time bot health.

"What stood out was the Sunflower Lab's unique blend of offshore efficiency and onshore-quality deliverables."— Chelsea Waddel, Business Operations Manager
200+ hrsSaved daily across departments
250+Cases processed per day
24/7Bots incl. weekends & holidays

Talk to us about a similar build

Höganäs manufacturing case study
CASE STUDY — MANUFACTURING / METAL POWDER

Automated customer onboarding & credit approval

Sales distributed Word documents for new customers to fill out, then re-typed the answers into Infor M3, and every credit approval took roughly two hours — capping the team at four approvals per eight-hour day. Scope of work: a Teams bot with Adaptive Cards, Microsoft Forms deployment to customers, automatic salesperson assignment, Allianz credit-check integration, and direct data push into Infor M3 ERP.

90%Onboarding time reduction
Daily credit approvals (4 → 36)
80%Approval time savings

Talk to us about a similar build

Dominion Engineering case study
CASE STUDY — NUCLEAR POWER ENGINEERING

90% efficiency on inspection tickets

Half of the team's time was spent typing receipt information into Dynamics 365 by hand, chasing missing CR numbers in QuickBase, and emailing inspectors about 50–70 receipts a day. Scope of work: an automated flow that creates the inspection ticket on every D365 purchase-receipt event, auto-attaches files with a naming convention, pulls CR numbers from QuickBase, notifies the right inspector in Teams, and reminds anyone with an unassigned ticket after 24 hours.

"Really, it's just about improving our process, saving time so our resources can complete other tasks, other safety related items."— Kara Kushma, Process Improvement and Training Specialist, Dominion Engineering
90%Efficiency improvement
60 hrsSaved per month
15 min → µsTask completion time

Talk to us about a similar build

Connect pediatrics case study
CASE STUDY — HEALTHCARE

Real-Time Labor & Margin Visibility for Pediatric Practice

Connect Pediatrics (1005 Congress Ave), a multi-branch pediatric practice, had no patient-level visibility into revenue, payroll cost, labor percentage, staffing percentage, or overtime exposure, leaving margin risk buried in manual reports. Sunflower Lab built a Power BI dashboard on SharePoint with branch, patient, and clinician-level views, plus automatic outlier detection for high labor percentage, excessive overtime, and understaffing.

1App replaces the shared spreadsheet
0Manual Approval Emails
LiveManager Visibility

Talk to us about a similar build

Microsoft Solutions Partner
Microsoft Solutions Partner

Certified Microsoft Solutions Partner

Sunflower Lab holds Microsoft Solutions Partner status for Power Automate, Power Apps, and SharePoint. This designation requires audited technical delivery, application-lifecycle discipline, and client-outcome standards defined by Microsoft.

Power Automate consulting in other cities & states we serve
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

It starts with us inside your actual process for a day or two, mapping where it slows down and who's stuck waiting on what. Most Austin engagements surface 3–5 workable automation candidates from that first pass. From there we build the flow, connect it to your existing systems, test it against real data, and hand over a runbook your own IT team can maintain going forward.
Cloud flows trigger off something digital — a form submission, an email, a status change in Dynamics 365 — and run in Microsoft's cloud with no desktop needed. Desktop bots (RPA) click through older systems the same way a person would, which matters for Austin manufacturers and healthcare providers still running legacy interfaces without a modern API. Most engagements use a mix of both.
Supplier compliance and quality-hold routing pays back fastest for manufacturing — it replaces a document trail spread across email, spreadsheets, and the ERP with one auto-routed flow. For healthcare operations, case documentation and verification-of-benefits checks are the highest-leverage starting point; it's the pattern behind our intraoperative neuromonitoring engagement, where manual per-case processing dropped from 45–60 minutes to a monitored, largely unattended flow.
Standard cloud flows are already included in most Microsoft 365 plans. Premium connectors, Power Automate for Desktop (attended and unattended), and AI Builder credits are priced separately. In your free assessment we recommend the specific plan — Per User, Per Flow, or Process — that matches your actual usage, so finance gets one clean answer rather than a flat retainer for automation you haven't asked for yet.
Yes. Cloud flows connect directly where a system has a modern API (Dynamics 365, SharePoint, most cloud ERPs); desktop bots handle the systems that don't, which is common with older ERP and clinical-records deployments. We've built this pattern before on Infor M3 (Höganäs onboarding & credit approval) and on a multi-step clinical-to-billing pipeline for a neuromonitoring provider — the same approach applies to Epic, SAP, or Workday environments.
Copilot can sit inside a flow as a step, not just a chat assistant — summarizing a document before it's routed, drafting the first pass of an approval note, or flagging an exception for a human to review instead of failing the flow silently. For Austin teams already paying for Copilot licensing, this is usually the cheapest add-on to an existing flow rather than a separate project.
Most single flows take 2 to 6 weeks from scoping call to go-live, depending on how many systems it touches and whether desktop RPA is involved on top of cloud flows. Simple approval-routing flows land on the faster end; anything touching a legacy ERP or requiring desktop bots runs closer to 6 weeks. Larger portfolios are staged in waves so early wins pay back before later flows go live.
You get a runbook and documentation built for your own IT team to run it, not a black box only we can touch. Most Austin clients keep us on for monitoring and adjustments in the first 30–90 days while the flow proves out under real volume, then bring maintenance fully in-house. A monthly retainer is available if you'd rather we stay on longer.
Contact

Request a Power Automate consultation

Schedule a 30-minute call to walk through one process you would like to stop doing by hand. You will receive a written scope tailored to your environment and a fixed-price estimate within three business days.

Get In Touch
Let's Build Something Together
Fill in the details and we'll get back to you within 2 business hours.
No commitment. We respond within 2 business hours.
Message Sent!
Thank you! A consultant will contact you within 2 business hours.
Redirecting in 3 seconds...
✓ Walkthrough of the process you want to automate ✓ Written scope and fixed price within 3 business days ✓ Guidance on Per Flow vs Per User vs Process licensing ✓ No obligation to proceed
Call Icon

Privacy Preference Center